Harford Property Tax Revolt

 

Here is a letter from a concerned citizen of Harford County summing up the events since our movement began:


May has been an interesting month in Harford County.   

The County Council rejected the budget proposed by the County Executive,  reduced property taxes, and discussed a reduction in the property tax assessment cap. 

In addition, the Governor signed a bill into law establishing a mostly elected School Board for the County. 

All are individually significant.  Collectively they are momentous. 

The budget proposed by the County Executive, although reduced from previous years, was reduced again, for good reason, by the County Council.  Not only was a reduced budget returned to the County Executive, but the property tax rate, on both real and commercial property,  to support it was reduced as well.  The reduction of 2 cents per hundred dollars of assessed values provides tax relief to taxpayers, and forces more efficiencies and economies in government operations.  Placing the burden of the budget on County employees and taxpayers , while seemingly easy, will no longer be the tool to resolve budget issues.  Hopefully the County Executive realizes this . 

The reduction in the property tax assessment cap from, 9% to 5%, as discussed would be effective in 2011.  It appears that the County Executive has signed on to this as well.  As his Internet web site claims, he worked with the County Council in the past year to effect this change.  It is unlikely however, that he was a full participant.  Had he been, he would not have presented the 2010 budge that he did, knowing full well that his principal revenue source will be severely reduced, and that more meaningful reductions will be required in 2011.  A full participant would have constructed a 2010 budget to accommodate reduced property tax revenue in 2011. 

Contrary to published accounts, the savings in the reduction of the property tax assessment cap, from 9% to 5%, are not trivial.  A 9% cap, will cause property taxes to double in 8 years, while a 5% cap will cause property taxes to increase by only 47%.  A 5% cap will cause property taxes to double in about 15 years.  In this same 15 years, a 9% cap will cause property taxes to increase more than 3.5 times, almost 4 times as much.  Quite a difference for any individual or couple starting out or seeking to retire in Harford County. 

At the budget hearings, Harford County residents conveyed a message of protest to the County Council on the proposed increase in property taxes required by the 2010 budget.  Some invoked political party affiliation, some invoked words from the founders of this great nation, others questioned the employment prospects and the supervisory hierarchy of individual Council members, and the Council as a whole.  All speakers were passionate.  I have to admit that I was there, too, and was caught up in the process.  Throughout these meetings, each member of the Council and the Council as a whole, showed uncommon restraint and civility, to those who offered support, and equally to those who were opposed to their actions. The character of the Council will be judged, not only by the end result, but also by the civility they extended.

The message of the Council on the budget, coupled with the Governor’s signing of the bill to establish an elected school board have an even greater significance to County residents. The message is clear, Harford County government has been returned to its residents.  The process of governing is no longer the exclusive domain of the County Executive.  The School Board will, now, also answer to the residents  of Harford County.  Residents of Harford County  have been given the opportunity, no, the obligation to participate in the process of government to establish a better future tomorrow.  Invoking slogans, political party affiliations, or commenting on employability will no longer work.  Just like the Preamble to the Constitution of the United States which begins with “We the people”, Harford  County government now starts with we the people.

Finally, by their actions the County Council provided a view of the  measure of the person.  The measure of the Council members will be taken, not by the level of education they achieved, nor the career path chosen, nor any other outward appearance.  It will be taken by their credibility, integrity and loyalty.  They have set new standards for measurement.  Indeed, a very high standard to strive for, as we the people start down the road to the future. 

 


Comments

Dave

Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:44:05

Thank you for closing the Fallston branch of the library. I hated that place and all of the great free resources it provided.

 

Maria

Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:15:09

Sir,
The library in Fallston is one of the least used branches, as described by Ms. Caplan, the library director. She states that the budget was presented by the executive. He is the one that is responsible. Please know your facts, you are out of the loop in terms of the budget process. The budget that Mr. Craig has dealt the departments this blow to their budget. The facts are that he did not allocate funds needed to maintain the proposed budget. He added funds to the operating budget ie. salaries and raises, and could not keep the rate of spending that he proposed. FYI, would you rather have people in houses or a library? Hours could be cut, staff could be cut, all types of other options, however the best choice that the board came up with in their informed capacity as the Library board, was to close one branch.

 

john mallamo

Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:13:29

Dave,

Sir,

As stated above in the previous response your complaint is against the County Executive. His failure to adjust his budget to the realities of the the current economic situation, even with full knowledge of the depth of its gravity, created this situation. Even now, rather than find real solutions he and others on his staff are attempting to portray the situation as something created by the County Council, and the disgruntled property tax payers.

 

Anne

Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:54:01

So from your responses above, I see that you feel that a reduction in county provided services is worth your $54 savings on a $300,000 valued property. Had it not been for the amendment to the budget brought about by this anti-tax group, county agencies wouldn't have had to receive an additional 5% cut on top of the 5% they already took. Without this additional cut, Fallston library would have been able to stay open and library employees wouldn't need to be laid off. Did it ever occur to you that some county employees (many which are county residents) will loose their jobs? So now you have saved $54, your neighbor gets laid off, their home goes into foreclosure, that’s really worth the tiny amount of tax savings you accomplished!

 



Leave a Reply

    About Patrick McGrady

    I'm fed up with the way Government at all levels has usurped the individual liberties of the people. 


    It starts with you and me. Let's take them back!


Fair taxes for Harford County!